From surprise power outages to emergency response toolkits, review how to handle wild site disruptions and tighten chain of custody. ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­    ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­  
View in browser
ESX News Header

August 12, 2026

TLP:CLEAR

In This Issue:

  • Situation Room: Minor disruptions at polling places come in all varieties, testing poll workers’ response capabilities.   
  • Resource Library: New Toolkit: Election Emergency Response Guides provide customizable resources designed to support election officials in responding to a range of potential incidents.    
  • Planning Desk: Taking time now to audit your chain of custody procedures provides an opportunity to identify and close gaps before the pressure is on this fall. 
Header text: Situation Room

Power Outages, Tornadoes, Vermin - Polling place disruptions in all forms test poll workers’ preparedness

 

Just after 11:00 a.m. on the morning of Election Day in mid-July, poll workers at two sites in Maricopa County, AZ found themselves in the dark.

 

Literally. Lights out. Power was lost that morning to just 1,800 customers in the county, but two active vote centers were among them. Additionally, a few e-pollbooks elsewhere in the county briefly had connectivity issues.

 

Between backups, redundancies, and power restoration within the hour, voting didn’t skip a beat, and we tip our hat to the poll workers who handled it all. This article is a tribute to all front-line election workers who have ever dealt with an unwelcome surprise, and a survey of election headlines shows there is no shortage of unexpected disruptions.

 

Power outages are so common that most voting machines are designed to run for hours on battery backup. Yet a voting site outage is always a mini-crisis. In recent elections, poll workers had to rely on backup procedures when lights went out in Sandoval County, New Mexico, Flint, Michigan, four counties (including at least 76 polling locations) in North Texas, and many other polling locations across the country.

 

Sometimes the cause of the outage is more concerning than the outage itself. Poll workers at three precincts in Kalamazoo County, Michigan, sheltered in place during a tornado warning (when a tornado is sighted) in a recent election. Storm conditions can also cause a domino effect of ballot paper swelling, preventing ink from drying and causing ballots to catch in machines, prompting error messages.

 

Disagreements outside polling places may not be rare, but it’s not common for them to unfold into a physical fight, like this one involving an outgoing council member in Bowie, Maryland, and the husband of a candidate. Poll workers can wind up in the middle, trying to separate antagonists, re-establish boundaries, restore calm, and ensure that the public feels safe entering and leaving.

 

The Bowie incident was tame compared to what a Clinton County, Indiana, precinct team faced during early voting. Confronted by a voter furious at being unable to cast his ballot, two poll workers were punched before police quickly restored order - fortunately, without injury. Still, the poll workers took the brunt of the voter’s anger just for doing their job.

 

Another class of unwelcome surprise is animal control. Workers at a Baltimore, Maryland, polling place had to call in a midday complaint about not only an infestation of mice, but also fleas. The building landlord countered that only one person had seen the mice, and that the fleas might have merely been other insects, misidentified. Unmollified, the workers convinced the election office to move their precinct to another site.

 

We offer a special shout-out to election staff from Cache County, Utah, who entered their counting facility and found several dead snakes on the floor. This only partially prepared them for the live snakes looking down on them from rafters and door frames.

 

At press time, we are unable to find reports of bears or mountain lions interfering with voting, but if it happens, resourceful poll workers will figure out who to call and what to do. To help make sure they’re ready for whatever comes their way, review the new emergency response templates in the Resource Library section of this newsletter.

  

The Situation Room focuses on real security incidents and threats in the news relevant to election security. To review previous issues, see the newsletter archive.

Header text: Resource Library

Election Emergency Response Templates

 

The Election Security Exchange has added two new resources to our resource library. The Toolkit: Election Emergency Response Guides is available in two versions: one designed for state election offices and one for local election offices. No matter how much planning goes into an election, unexpected situations happen. Power outages, severe weather, security incidents, and other disruptions all require fast, thoughtful responses. When an emergency occurs, having the right resources and contact information close by can help your team respond quickly and confidently.

 

Each toolkit includes:

  • An Election Emergency Response Poster Template that can be customized for your office, with space to document important contact information for law enforcement, emergency management, election leadership, and other key partners. It also includes practical response recommendations for a variety of potential election incidents.
  • An Emergency Response Lanyard Card that can be customized with the same key contacts and response information in a convenient format for use during the election. These cards can be carried or worn by election staff, poll workers, ballot security teams, and transport teams to help ensure critical information is available when needed.

These toolkits can help your office prepare for and respond to unexpected incidents. They are designed to enable quick decisions, clear communication, and coordinated response when it matters most. Pair these tools with a close look at your chain of custody procedures, the focus of this week’s Planning Desk, so your team is ready both to respond to the unexpected and to document that response with confidence.

 

The Resource Library section of the newsletter spotlights election security resources. All highlighted resources are available online in the Resource Library.

Header text: Planning Desk

Week E-12: Secure your processes with a Chain of Custody Audit

 

Chain of custody is the process of tracking the control, transfer, handling, and disposition of election equipment, data, and records. Maintaining a verifiable, auditable chain of custody offers proof that items have not been altered, tampered with, or accessed by unauthorized persons.

 

For election offices, this is a foundational security measure to show the public that the electoral process is secure and free from interference. Every piece of equipment, data, and paper record must be accounted for by documenting who had custody – who was responsible, what action they took, and when it occurred.

 

To ensure your chain of custody processes are airtight before the election begins, take 30 minutes to review your procedures from end to end, including programming; ballot proofing, preparation and mailing; pollbook preparation; ballot return; tabulation; and canvassing.

 

1. Map and Trace the Workflow

  • Account for every asset: Review how changes in location or possession are documented for every piece of equipment, data, and record at every phase.
  • Inspect seal protocols: Review your current seal recording forms, noting who logs the information and when.
  • Audit with a critical eye: Approach your forms as an outsider with no context about elections, questioning every assumption. Do they clearly describe the item or process they refer to?

2. Identify and Close the Gaps

  • Look for vulnerabilities: Pinpoint any step where doubt could be cast on whether an item was exclusively in an authorized person's custody.
  • Reconstruct the timeline: Verify that your forms contain enough detail to reconstruct who performed which activity, and when.
  • Implement fixes: Fill any identified gaps by introducing new forms or seal records. If existing forms lack necessary detail about the responsible individual or the asset itself, revise them immediately.

Investing time now to evaluate and strengthen your chain of custody can help you - and your voters - be confident that every ballot is securely cast and accurately counted.

 

Additional Resources

  • Center for Internet Security: Election Security Spotlight - Chain of Custody
  • The Elections Group: Chain of Custody
  • U.S. Alliance for Election Excellence: Drop Box Chain of Custody Tool
  • U.S. Election Assistance Commission: Best Practices: Chain of Custody 

The Planning Desk is a running timeline of key election security tasks. You can find prior editions in the newsletter archive.

 

 

Header text: Election Security News


Want to get daily updates on election news? Subscribe to electionline.

  •  AI Didn't Create the Election Infrastructure Problem. It Just Made It Urgent. | Tech Policy Press (August 7, 2026) // National 
  •  AI is getting better at election facts, but voters shouldn't rely on it | CyberScoop (August 5, 2026) // National 
  •  AI and Elections: How Well Do AI Platforms Answer Voter Questions? | States United Democracy Center (August 4, 2026) // National
  • Florida Local Government Cybersecurity Program | Florida Digital Service (August 11, 2026) // Florida
  •  

LinkedIn
YouTube
Email
Website

Copyright © 2026 Election Security Exchange. All rights reserved. TLP:CLEAR

 

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to the Election Security Exchange Newsletter.

 

Find this useful? Pass it along and invite other election teams to subscribe.

Subscribe

Election Security Exchange

712 H Street NE, Suite 2456

Washington, DC, 20002, United States

Unsubscribe Manage Preferences